AI Cases To Watch

17.03.2026

Track the landmark legal cases redefining AI law. Discover in-depth insights into copyright disputes, AI liability, and privacy regulations that are setting the global standards for tomorrow's technology.

AI Law Cases to Watch
Legal Intelligence

AI Cases to Watch

07 Active Cases · 2026
New York Times v. OpenAI & Microsoft
Copyright
CourtS.D.N.Y.
FiledDec 2023
StatusDiscovery
JurisdictionUnited States

The NYT alleges OpenAI and Microsoft unlawfully reproduced millions of its articles to train GPT models, constituting direct and vicarious copyright infringement. The case raises foundational questions about whether AI training on copyrighted content qualifies as "fair use" under US law.

Why it matters The outcome will determine whether the entire generative AI industry's training practices are legally viable — potentially requiring retroactive licensing arrangements worth billions.
Filed
Served
Discovery
Motions
Trial
Getty Images v. Stability AI
Copyright
CourtD. Del. & UK IPEC
FiledJan 2023
StatusParallel proceedings
JurisdictionUS & UK

Getty alleges Stability AI scraped and trained its Stable Diffusion model on over 12 million copyrighted photographs without consent, generating AI outputs that embed Getty's watermarks — potentially constituting both copyright and trademark infringement.

Why it matters First major parallel US/UK AI copyright case. UK and US fair use/dealing doctrines will be tested simultaneously, potentially producing divergent outcomes that create transatlantic compliance complexity.
Filed
Motions
Active
Hearing
Judgment
Deepfake Election Regulation Cases
Electoral Law
Lead CaseKohls v. Bonta
CourtN.D. Cal.
StatusPost-ruling
DecisionAug 2025

California's Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act (AB 2655) was partially struck down by a federal judge in August 2025 for conflicting with Section 230 and raising First Amendment concerns. Minnesota's deepfake election ban faces parallel challenge from X (formerly Twitter).

Why it matters The cases define the constitutional limits of deepfake regulation in democratic elections — and determine whether free speech protections for political satire can coexist with voter protection obligations.
Filed
Injunction
Ruling
Appeal?
Final
Mobley v. Workday (AI Hiring Bias)
Liability
CourtN.D. Cal.
Class StatusCertified May 2025
StatusClass action
ClassApplicants 40+

Derek Mobley applied to over 100 jobs through Workday's AI screening system and was rejected within minutes each time. The case achieved nationwide class action certification in May 2025, covering all applicants over 40 rejected by the AI system — illustrating how a single algorithm can discriminate at unprecedented scale.

Why it matters First major class action targeting an AI vendor's discriminatory algorithm. The case may resolve whether AI vendors or deploying employers bear primary liability for algorithmic bias — shaping the liability architecture for all AI employment tools.
Filed
Cert. Motion
Class Action
Discovery
Trial
Dun & Bradstreet Austria — GDPR & Automated Decisions
Privacy
CourtCJEU (C-203/22)
Decided5 March 2025
StatusDecided
JurisdictionEU (all 27)

The CJEU clarified that data controllers must provide individuals with a concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible explanation of the logic involved in automated processing. Complexity of the system does not relieve the controller of this duty — a significant ruling for AI credit scoring and automated decision systems across the EU.

Why it matters Sets the EU-wide standard for what constitutes a meaningful explanation of AI-driven automated decisions under GDPR Art. 15(1)(h) — directly constraining opaque credit, hiring, and benefits algorithms.
Referral
Advocate General
Decided
Implementation
National effect
Share